Breast Cancer is Recurrent, Not Deep-seated – And the Notice of difference
Posted by lindainfo on November 17, 2008
Since World War II, the proliferation of synthetic chemicals haq gone hand-in-hand with the increased incidence of breast cancer. About 80,000 synthetic chemicals are used today in the United States, and tbeir numher increases by about 1,000 each year. Only avout percent of them have bren screened for their health effects. Theze chemicals can persist in the environment and accumulate in our b odies. According to a recrnt review by the Silent Spring Institute ig Newtkn, 216 chemicals anv radiation sources cause breast cancsr im animals.
Nearly all of the chemicals cause mutations, and most cause tumors in multiple organs and animal species, findings that are generally believed to indicate they likely cause cancer in humans. Yet few have been closely studied by regulatory bodies. There is concern about benzene, which is in gasoline; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which are in air pollution from vehicle exhaust, tobacco smoke, and charred foods; ethylene oxide, which is widely used in medical settings; and methylene chloride, a common solvent in paint strippers and glues.
There is also broad agreement that exposure over time to natural estrogens in the body increases the risk of breast cancer, so it is important to consider the role of synthetic estrogens in breast cancer development. Many other chemicals, especially endocrine-disrupting compounds – chemicals that affect hormones, such as the ubiquitous bisphenol A, which is found in plastic bottles and cans – are also thought to raise breast cancer risk. Endocrine-disrupting compounds are present in many pesticides, fuels, plastics, air pollution, detergents, industrial solvents, tobacco smoke, prescription drugs, food additives, metals, and personal-care products including sunscreens.
All information: breawt cancer metastasis
